A Quick Reference Guide to Combating Climate Change via Carbon Capture
- Hüsnü Tolga Eyyuboğlu
- Jan 15
- 6 min read
Updated: Feb 28
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a pivotal technology in the global fight against climate change. It encompasses a suite of processes aimed at capturing carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from industrial processes and energy production, preventing them from entering the atmosphere. With increasing attention on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon capture is gaining traction as a critical tool for achieving net-zero targets. This article delves into the fundamentals, abbreviations, applications, challenges, and global efforts surrounding carbon capture, expanding to provide a thorough understanding of its role in the climate crisis.

What Is Carbon Capture?
Carbon capture involves trapping CO₂ emissions at their source, transporting them to a storage site, and either storing them permanently or utilizing them in industrial processes. It is an integral part of CCUS, a broader framework that incorporates both storage and utilization.
CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage): This comprehensive approach includes capturing CO₂ emissions, finding innovative uses for them, and storing them safely.
CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage): Focuses exclusively on capturing and storing CO₂.
DAC (Direct Air Capture): Removes CO₂ directly from the ambient air, addressing both historical and ongoing emissions.
BECCS (Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage): Combines biomass energy production with carbon capture to achieve net-negative emissions.
EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery): Uses captured CO₂ to extract additional oil from existing reservoirs, simultaneously storing the CO₂ underground.

The Science Behind Carbon Capture
Carbon capture technologies generally fall into three categories, each with current utilization and future potential. These processes can be better understood through their chemical reactions and associated mass balances:
Post-Combustion Capture:
Simplified Process Formula:
CO₂ (g) + H₂O (l) + Amine → Amine-CO₂ Complex (aq)
Regeneration: Amine-CO₂ Complex (aq) + Heat → CO₂ (g) + Amine
Mass Balance:
For every mole of CO₂ captured, 1 mole of amine is required in the absorption phase, with minimal losses in the regeneration process.
This method is widely used today and represents 70% of global carbon capture projects. Improvements in solvent recovery and energy efficiency are expected to drive future adoption.
Pre-Combustion Capture:
Simplified Process Formula:
CH₄ (g) + H₂O (g) → CO₂ (g) + 4H₂ (g) (Steam Methane Reforming)
Mass Balance:
For every mole of methane processed, 1 mole of CO₂ is captured, along with 4 moles of hydrogen produced.
Pre-combustion is especially important in hydrogen production, currently accounting for 20% of carbon capture. By 2050, its role in hydrogen economies is expected to expand significantly.
Direct Air Capture (DAC):
Simplified Process Formula:
CO₂ (g) + NaOH (aq) → Na₂CO₃ (aq)
Regeneration: Na₂CO₃ (aq) + Heat → CO₂ (g) + NaOH (aq)
Mass Balance:
For every mole of CO₂ removed from the air, a corresponding amount of sodium hydroxide is consumed and regenerated during the process.
DAC comprises 10% of current projects but has potential for exponential growth, supported by advancements in energy efficiency and material sciences.
Applications of Carbon Capture
Carbon capture is versatile and applicable across multiple sectors. Below are definitions, real-life example facilities, current utilization percentages, cost comparisons, and specific process descriptions:
Power Generation (45% of current utilization):
Capturing CO₂ emissions from coal and natural gas power plants to reduce their carbon footprint.
The Petra Nova project in Texas, USA, captures CO₂ from a coal-fired power plant and uses it for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).
CO₂ (g) + H₂O (l) + Amine → Amine-CO₂ Complex (aq)
$40 to $80 per ton of CO₂ captured.
Cement and Steel Manufacturing (25%):
Mitigating emissions from the production of cement and steel by capturing CO₂ released during chemical reactions and high-temperature processes.
The Norcem Brevik plant in Norway captures CO₂ from cement production.
CaCO₃ (s) → CaO (s) + CO₂ (g) (Cement)
For every mole of calcium carbonate decomposed, 1 mole of CO₂ is released.
$50 to $100 per ton of CO₂ captured.
Chemical Production (15%):
Capturing CO₂ generated during the production of ammonia, hydrogen, and other chemicals.
The Quest CCS facility in Alberta, Canada, captures CO₂ from hydrogen production.
CH₄ (g) + H₂O (g) → CO₂ (g) + 4H₂ (g)
$30 to $60 per ton of CO₂ captured.
Direct Air Capture (DAC) (10%):
Removing CO₂ directly from ambient air to address both legacy and ongoing emissions.
Climeworks’ Orca plant in Iceland, which captures CO₂ from the air and stores it underground.
CO₂ (g) + NaOH (aq) → Na₂CO₃ (aq)
$100 to $600 per ton of CO₂ captured.
Synthetic Fuels and EOR (5%):
Utilizing captured CO₂ to produce synthetic fuels or for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).
The Air Products CO₂ capture project in Port Arthur, Texas, captures CO₂ for EOR.
CO₂ (g) + 3H₂ (g) → CH₄ (g) + H₂O (g)
$50 to $150 per ton of CO₂ captured.
Global Efforts and Statistics
The United States:
The U.S. leads in operational CCUS projects, supported by policies like the 45Q tax credit, which incentivizes carbon capture and storage.
As of 2024, the U.S. operates over 12 large-scale CCUS facilities, capturing approximately 25 million metric tons of CO₂ annually.
European Union:
The EU has set ambitious goals for carbon neutrality by 2050, with carbon capture as a central pillar.
Projects like Northern Lights in Norway aim to create a shared CO₂ transport and storage infrastructure for Europe.
China:
As the world's largest emitter, China is expanding its CCUS capabilities. The country plans to capture 20 million metric tons of CO₂ annually by 2030.
International Energy Agency (IEA):
The IEA highlights that CCUS must account for 15% of the cumulative emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement targets.
Over 130 CCUS projects are in various stages of development globally.
Challenges and Criticisms
Cost: The capital-intensive nature of CCUS technologies remains a barrier. For instance, DAC costs range from $100 to $600 per ton of CO₂ captured.
Energy Intensity: The process requires significant energy, reducing the overall efficiency of power plants.
Infrastructure Needs: Extensive pipelines and storage facilities are necessary for large-scale deployment.
Public Perception: Concerns about the safety of underground storage and the potential for leaks hinder public acceptance.
Limited Adoption: As of now, CCUS contributes less than 1% of global emission reductions.
Future Directions
Emerging trends and technologies are shaping the future of carbon capture:
Modular Systems:
Compact, containerized solutions are lowering costs and enabling decentralized carbon capture.
Advanced Materials:
Innovations in sorbents, membranes, and catalysts are improving the efficiency and scalability of CCUS technologies.
Integrated Energy Systems:
Combining CCUS with renewable energy sources like wind and solar enhances the sustainability of captured CO₂ utilization.
Policy Support:
Initiatives like carbon pricing, emissions trading systems (ETS), and international collaborations are accelerating CCUS adoption.
Today, the global carbon capture capacity stands at approximately 45 million metric tons per year. While this is a significant step, it is far from sufficient. To align with the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C, the world must scale up its carbon capture capacity to 7.6 billion metric tons annually by 2050. This represents an almost 170-fold increase in capacity over the next three decades.
Achieving this ambitious target will require:
Massive Investments:
Significant funding to develop, deploy, and scale advanced carbon capture technologies.
Policy and Regulatory Support:
Governments must implement robust incentives, including carbon pricing mechanisms, tax credits, and subsidies.
Innovation:
Continued research and development to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and explore novel capture and utilization methods.
Global Collaboration:
A unified effort across nations to share knowledge, infrastructure, and resources.
So, where do we go from here? The future of carbon capture is brimming with potential, but it’s also riddled with challenges that demand innovation, investment, and collaboration. As we stand on the brink of a global energy transition, we must ask ourselves: Are we ready to scale up carbon capture to meet the climate crisis head-on?
The reality is clear—scaling from today’s 45 million metric tons of captured CO₂ to the 7.6 billion metric tons required by 2050 is no small feat. It calls for bold action across industries, governments, and communities. We need smarter policies, cutting-edge materials, and integrated energy solutions that align with renewables to enhance sustainability.
But here’s the exciting part: the technologies are evolving, and the momentum is building. Modular, decentralized solutions are making carbon capture more accessible, while financial incentives like carbon pricing and emissions trading systems are fueling investment. The question is—will we seize this opportunity to drive change at the pace the planet needs?
Carbon capture isn’t a silver bullet, but it’s a powerful weapon in our fight against climate change. If we push the boundaries of innovation and embrace a collective responsibility, we can turn today's challenges into tomorrow's breakthroughs.
The future is ours to shape—are we ready to capture it?
Comments